_ »·
.’‘_»V
itit * _
24 Kentucky Bulletm N0. ,264 I s
I .4 I
L.'.€;.. ‘; aI II
_ TABLE XV—Continued.
*‘”"" ` I Lot 5*5*.. L¤i`T3"— (
·»— — ll ·
. IT'i*i.·£';°·lF;{*a I I ·
` I: ·I-”` Cottonseed meal ....,,................................ I 139.93 lbs. I 175.85 lbs.
I *_·Q_*;—{j:_Y_I§I 5I com guage _,.___..._.....,.......................... . ..... I 1,478.661bs. I 1,937.60 lbs.
Amin nay ................................................ I 161.00 lbs. I .........
I? Straw _____________________________________,_____,__.,..._..,,.. I 94.94 lbs. I 97.14 lbs.
; € F. II I I
1 I EI —- —· -—-—· —··*"?‘
TABLE XVI. I
I ~ Daily Gains Per Steer. I.
nw: =;;*;1-. I
··‘ I *· ....._.-._..;- -— —
j _ I Lot 5 Lot 6 ¤
A I;é’a»2a». ii ’ . .
~· first fou1· weeks and that the silage contained a large percentage
i? . of water. These two facts account for the small ains made
I5 }‘?l‘X.€‘;‘ TI ( g
II in the first four weeks. The gains made were smaller than those ’
—~ made in the two preceding years. As in the second experiment i
I- the lar¤·er ains were made b Lot 5. Table XVI shows that
Cl gr y
the excess gain occurred after alfalfa hay was added to the
,7 ration. Reference to Tables IV and X shows that in each of
\.>;.x:ak ':§ ‘ _ I
. the two preceding years Lot 5 gained more than Lot 6 after tht .
clover hay was added. I
I WVhen alfalfa hay was added to the rat1on of Lot 5 the _
; amount of cottonseed meal fed was reduced so that the amount
of protein in the cottonseed meal and alfalfa hay combined
ffl i` ;_ if .
cqualed that in the cottonseed meal fed to Lot 6.
r,.i*
¤ — ._ A summary of the third experiment is given in Table XVII.
Prices of feeds are given at the bottom of the table. .
is- I ·
X -
*}'$1_i I ii ISI ·