The KDL is under construction

Newspapers are searchable at the Kentucky Digital Newspaper Program.

0-9 | A | B | C | D | E | F | G | H | I | J | K | L | M | N | O | P | Q | R | S | T | U | V | W | X | Y | Z

Image 5 of The Advocate Messenger April 16, 2012

Part of The Advocate Messenger

MONDAY, APRIL 16, 2012 A5 THE ADVOCATE-MESSENGER WWW.AMNEWS.COM HEALTH Tuna linked to salmonella outbreak AP Photo Sonja Eriksson poses for a photograph March 3 in southern Sweden. Europe is a patchwork of restrictions for people who need help having a child; Marie Eriksson, a Swedish librarian, traveled to a fertility clinic in Denmark after deciding she wanted to have a child on her own. Fertility treatment bans in Europe draw criticism LONDON (AP) — More than three decades after Britain produced the world’s first test-tube baby, Europe is a patchwork of restrictions for people who need help having a child. Many countries have strict rules on who is allowed to get fertility treatments. And recent court rulings suggest nothing’s likely to change anytime soon. France and Italy forbid single women and lesbian couples from using artificial insemination and in vitro fertilization, or IVF, to conceive. Austria and Italy are among those banning all egg and sperm donations for IVF. Germany and Norway ban donating eggs, but not sperm. Countries including Sweden require couples to have a stable relationship for at least a year to qualify for fertility treatment. Switzerland, among others, requires couples to be married. And nearly everywhere in Europe except Ukraine, couples are banned from hiring a woman to carry a pregnancy for them. “These laws are completely out of date,” said Dr. Francoise Shenfield, a fertility expert at University College London. “It’s a medical treatment and the decision to treat should be up to doctors,” not judges, said Shenfield, an ethics expert for the European Society for Human Reproduction and Embryology. Placing bans on egg and sperm donation is “discriminating against infertile couples,” she added, although she acknowledged there were valid medical reasons for not treating some patients, like women over 50. The European laws stand in contrast to comparatively few restrictions elsewhere, including in the U.S., Australia, Brazil and Canada. Experts estimate thousands of Europeans travel to another country each year for help having a baby, though exact figures aren’t recorded. Many are single women who go abroad to get artificial insemination, which is banned for single women in countries including Sweden, Germany and Italy. Marie Eriksson, a 36-yearold single mother in Sweden, described the restrictions as prejudice. “Having a child is not a right, but the possibility should not be forbidden because you don’t have a partner,” she said. Eriksson, a librarian, traveled to a fertility clinic in Denmark after deciding she wanted to have a child on her own. “The alternative was to go out and meet a stranger at a pub,” she said. She gave birth to her daughter, Sonja, in 2008. “It was totally worth it,” she said of the seven treatments she paid for. Reasons for the restrictions vary from country to country. Many cite concerns about creating “unnatural” relationships between donors, parents and children. Others are driven by religious or cultural objections. Recent attempts to change the laws have so far failed. Last November, the European Court of Human Rights upheld an Austrian regulation that forbids using sperm and egg donors for IVF. In that case, two married couples sued the Austrian government, arguing the ban violated their right to a “private and family life” under the European Convention on Human Rights. The court ultimately ruled the restriction was justified and cited problems like “splitting motherhood” between a biological mother and the woman carrying the fetus. “I’m often dumbfounded by the position some European countries take on IVF,” said Dr. Norbert Gleicher, medical director of the Center for Human Reproduction, a private clinic in New York City. The restrictions in many European countries would be unthinkable in the U.S., Gleicher said, adding about 40 percent of his patients travel from abroad, many from Europe. In Sweden, lawmakers are considering whether to change the law so that all single women have access to fertility treatment. Eriksson said the restrictions no longer match reality. “There are so many different kinds of families today that it is not sustainable to maintain laws and regulations based on traditional family ideals,” she said. For IVF, women must undergo hormone stimulation to produce eggs and a procedure to extract them from the ovaries. Embryos are created by mixing sperm and eggs together in a lab, then transferred into a woman’s womb. Fertility treatment remains a taboo subject in many countries. Germany’s history of eugenics — where Nazi doctors forcibly sterilized or euthanized people in an attempt to eliminate hereditary illnesses and handicapped people — makes officials nervous about any procedures that handle embryos. It was only last year that Germany approved an embryo test commonly used elsewhere to spot genetic problems. The test, generally used only in IVF pregnancies, is still banned in Austria and Italy. In other countries, religion carries more weight. France and Italy both have strong historic ties to the Roman Catholic Church, which forbids IVF, primarily because the procedure may involve the destruction of embryos. The church is also against artificial insemination because it believes procreation should only be by a husband and wife through the natural act of sex. Until 2004, Italy’s fertility laws were fairly lax, leading to pregnancies in women as old as 60, and a proliferation of woman “renting” their wombs. A law supported by leading Catholic groups that year clamped down on egg and sperm donation, limited the number of embryos transferred, and outlawed the practice of freezing embryos. The law restricts IVF to “stable, heterosexual couples who live together and are of childbearing age.” Italy says allowing donated eggs could exploit women and that the practice “would lead to a weakening of the entire structure of society.” Most couples seeking fertility treatments don’t need donated eggs and sperm. And many government health systems will pay for fertility treatments for those who have been trying at least three years to conceive. People in Western Europe who seek medical treatment elsewhere cannot be prosecuted at home even if the treatment is illegal in their own country. But there can be other complications. For example, in France, children born through surrogacy are not entitled to a French passport. Still, authorities are struggling with how to deal with the complexity of IVF families. Last month, France’s Court of Appeal upheld a decision to grant civil status — similar to nationality — to twins carried by a surrogate mother in India for a French couple. But in 2011, the French Supreme Court denied civil status to twins born to a surrogate mother in the U.S. For gay and lesbian couples in France, Italy, Switzerland and elsewhere, only one partner can be the child’s legal father or mother. “These restrictions imply that gays and lesbians are second-class citizens and that a child has to be raised in a conventional family,” said Angelo Berbotto, a lawyer and acting secretary of NELFA, Europe’s largest organization for gay and lesbian families. Opponents say national health systems are not obligated to allow artificial reproduction techniques for same-sex couples. WASHINGTON (AP) — A yellowfin tuna product used to make dishes like sushi and sashimi sold at restaurants and grocery stores has been linked with an outbreak of salmonella that has sickened more than 100 people in 20 states and the District of Columbia, federal health authorities said Friday. The Food and Drug Administration said 116 illnesses have been reported, including 12 people who have been hospitalized. No deaths have been reported. Moon Marine USA Corp. of Cupertino, Calif., also known as MMI, is voluntarily recalling 58,828 pounds of frozen raw yellowfin tuna. It was labeled as Nakaochi Scrape AA or AAA when it was sold to grocery stores and restaurants and is scraped off the fish bones and looks like a ground product. The product is not available for sale to individual consumers but may have been used to make sushi, sashimi, ceviche and similar dishes available in restaurants and grocery stores. Many of the people who became ill reported eating raw tuna in sushi as “spicy tuna,” the FDA said. Reports of the foodborne illness caused by salmonella bareilly have mainly come from the Eastern Seaboard and South, though cases have been reported as far west as Missouri and Texas. As of Friday, illness had been reported these states and the District of Columbia: Alabama (2), Arkansas (1), Connecticut (5), District of Columbia (2), Florida (1), As Georgia (5), Illinois (10), Louisiana (2), Maryland (11), Massachusetts (8), Mississippi (1), Missouri (2), New Jersey (7), New York (24), North Carolina (2), Pennsylvania (5), Rhode Island (5), South Carolina (3), Texas (3), Virginia (5), and Wisconsin (12). The memo notes there is likely a 30-day lag time between when people become sick and when cases are reported to health officials. The raw yellowfin tuna product may have passed through several distributors before reaching the restaurant and grocery market and may not be clearly labeled. Previous outbreaks of salmonella bareilly have been linked to bean sprouts, which are grown in warm, damp conditions. The most common symptoms of salmonella are diarrhea, abdominal cramps and fever within eight to 72 hours of eating the contaminated food. The illness can be severe or even life-threatening for infants, older people, pregnant women and people with weakened immune systems. The FDA recommended that people be cautious about eating raw seafood, inquire about the source and “when in doubt, don’t eat it.” AMERICA’S * FAVORITE STIHL IS THE #1 SELLING BRAND OF GASOLINE-POWERED HANDHELD OUTDOOR POWER EQUIPMENT IN AMERICA* *“Number one selling brand” is based on syndicated Irwin Broh Research (commercial landscapers) as well as independent consumer research of 2009-2011 U.S. sales and market share data for the gasoline-powered handheld outdoor power equipment category combined sales to consumers and commercial landscapers. FS 45 $ TRIMMER FS 55 R TRIMMER $ Easy-to-use, well-balanced trimmer Versatile, straight-shaft trimmer for aroundthe-home or light-duty professional use 15995 Lightweight, reliable and fast starting 22995 Can use nylon line or STIHL PolyCut™ head N! BR 200 BACKPACK BLOWER $ 27995 MS 290 STIHL $ FARM BOSS® Simpli ed starting makes this powerful blower easy to use DOUBLE YOUR WARRANTY 37995 16" bar Our #1 selling chain saw model WHEN YOU PURCHASE 6 BOTTLES OF STIHL HP ULTRA OIL OR 6 CANS OF STIHL MotoMix® PREMIXED FUEL Double limited warranty protection applies to STIHL gasoline-powered products purchased and registered for personal non-income producing, family and household purposes only. Other restrictions apply. See dealer for details. Available at participating dealers while supplies last. © 2012 STIHL BES12-241-101779-2 Danville Greenline Implement Inc. 1401 Minor Road 859-236-8500 Special Cow Sale- Friday, April 20 @ 6:00PM For More Info Call the Yards. Danville Industrial Park Distributors 1236 Lebanon Rd 859-236-0068 SCAN HERE TO FIND YOUR LOCAL STIHL DEALER or visit

Hosted by the University of Kentucky

Contact us: